Chicago sang:
Jul. 3rd, 2010 04:58 am"Does anybody really know what time it is?"
Well... have you seen http://liveclock.com/ ?
It always seems to be identical to the sync on my computer clock... which has led me to believe that both are synchronized up with the big daddy of time servers somewhere... and thus, accurate (effectively at least).
After my recent experiment with timepieces, uh, I got one of those Casio satellite watches (not terribly expensive these days :> )... and it arrived today.
But... after IT does its sync, it seems to be about 23 seconds slower than the online live clock! 8| *boggle*
Then again, *this* site ( http://www.time.gov/timezone.cgi?Eastern/d/-5/java ) does seem to sync up exactly with the little watch. So is the site Microsoft syncs its clock up with... always 23 seconds fast?
We used to have at least two methods of getting what was thought to be rather accurate time... the phone service (discontinued here), and shortwave radio. Do I need to fire up my old shortwave radio to check these out? rarrgh.
Thoughts and info welcomed.
Well... have you seen http://liveclock.com/ ?
It always seems to be identical to the sync on my computer clock... which has led me to believe that both are synchronized up with the big daddy of time servers somewhere... and thus, accurate (effectively at least).
After my recent experiment with timepieces, uh, I got one of those Casio satellite watches (not terribly expensive these days :> )... and it arrived today.
But... after IT does its sync, it seems to be about 23 seconds slower than the online live clock! 8| *boggle*
Then again, *this* site ( http://www.time.gov/timezone.cgi?Eastern/d/-5/java ) does seem to sync up exactly with the little watch. So is the site Microsoft syncs its clock up with... always 23 seconds fast?
We used to have at least two methods of getting what was thought to be rather accurate time... the phone service (discontinued here), and shortwave radio. Do I need to fire up my old shortwave radio to check these out? rarrgh.
Thoughts and info welcomed.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 02:17 pm (UTC)Good luck. *hugs*
no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 02:43 pm (UTC)I miss "Popcorn"!
Since I'm perpetually late, I like watches and clocks that gain time (run fast) so that I'm never -quite- as late as I think I am. But then, I'm neurotic...
no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 07:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 05:14 pm (UTC)On Windows XP Pro, I can synchronize my system clock by double-clicking it, clicking on the Internet Time tab, and clicking "Update now" or checking the box labeled "Automatically synchronize with an Internet time server".
I checked it against the Time.gov site, and I don't see any difference.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 06:35 pm (UTC)w32tm /query /status
to get some useful information about time keeping. Use "w32tm" without any arguments to see some (looong) help message.
The time source on the web page might be your local computer's clock after all - which sort of would put them in sync.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 06:57 pm (UTC)If you hare in a Windows domain, you should NOT run w32tm on a client PC, things will get confused :D
CYa!
Mako
no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 07:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 06:38 pm (UTC)Linux boxes use ntpd: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ntpd
What you want is the equivalent of ntpd for Windows and the best choice for that is Tardis:
http://www.kaska.demon.co.uk/download.htm
I have used Tardis for over a decade now. Reliable and solid stuff.
Mako
no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 07:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 08:19 pm (UTC)I used to use WWVH when I was stationed in Pearl, the signal was somewhat stronger ;-)
CYa!
Mako
no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 09:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 10:02 pm (UTC)They broadcast in a 2000 km radius from the DCF77 transmitters in Frankfurt, so most of Europe is covered.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-03 10:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 03:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-25 07:58 am (UTC)