wordable peevz
May. 26th, 2008 09:24 pmAnother LJ member just posted about grammar, and it was quite a thought-provoking thread! So I thought I'd mention a couple here...
We all get a bit relaxed in blogs, and entries are understandably conversational... so this is in reference mainly to public speech.
Do you have some peeves... things that just grind on you when people misspeak them over and over? Probably... heh! ...and right now two of mine are
1) NUKULAR (when it's SO EASY for people to say nuclear right, as in "NEW CLEAR"!)... and
2) when people use the article before H incorrectly (saying jibberish sentences such as "An house is not an home" or "An historic moment is an happening to remember")... eeeeesh! Even paid TV announcers! It makes the skin crawl... *shiver* ;P
The H modifier depends on the way the H is used by the vowel that comes after it! It's not "an" every time!! ;P
Correct usage is thus, "It is an honor to embrace a happiness beyond words" ... or "Don't make a hasty decision when an homage is due"... or "A humble apology is a heroic gesture"... and so forth...
If the H is silent, the article defers to the vowel.. if it's not (like in "hubris" and "heaven") the article reflects its consonant quality! arf! ;D
...I hope you enjoyed this little venture into the kooky-linguistics arena :D .
We all get a bit relaxed in blogs, and entries are understandably conversational... so this is in reference mainly to public speech.
Do you have some peeves... things that just grind on you when people misspeak them over and over? Probably... heh! ...and right now two of mine are
1) NUKULAR (when it's SO EASY for people to say nuclear right, as in "NEW CLEAR"!)... and
2) when people use the article before H incorrectly (saying jibberish sentences such as "An house is not an home" or "An historic moment is an happening to remember")... eeeeesh! Even paid TV announcers! It makes the skin crawl... *shiver* ;P
The H modifier depends on the way the H is used by the vowel that comes after it! It's not "an" every time!! ;P
Correct usage is thus, "It is an honor to embrace a happiness beyond words" ... or "Don't make a hasty decision when an homage is due"... or "A humble apology is a heroic gesture"... and so forth...
If the H is silent, the article defers to the vowel.. if it's not (like in "hubris" and "heaven") the article reflects its consonant quality! arf! ;D
...I hope you enjoyed this little venture into the kooky-linguistics arena :D .
no subject
Date: 2008-05-27 04:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-27 05:56 am (UTC)Also, it seems that the use of "whom" has pretty much flown the coop these days...I rarely hear anyone say it anymore, properly or otherwise.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-27 09:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-27 10:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-27 05:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-27 09:32 am (UTC)From a Tony Hancock comedy
"The name is 'Ancock, the Haech is silent and henybody that says hotherwise his hignorant"
Hehe :)
no subject
Date: 2008-05-27 10:29 am (UTC)Just annoys me when people can't use the right one.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-27 11:21 am (UTC)The English word I hate the most of all, is defenitely definitely. Definetely.
I hate it how people here mess up the language constantly. I even often see grammar errors in official articles and books.
Ik worD
Jij worDT
Hij worDT
Wij worDEN
Jullie worDEN
Zij worDEN
Ik werD
Jij werD
Hij werD
Wij werDEN
Jullie werDEN
Zij werDEN
Ik ben GEworDEN
Het is MIJN fiets
JOUW fiets
ZIJN fiets
HAAR fiets
ONZE fiets
HUN fiets, de fiets is van HEN (they're doing this wrong so often, they want to make it official Dutch)
Ik leer, jij leert, wij leren, ik leerde, jullie leerden, ik heb geleerD
Ik steel, jij steelt, wij stelen, ik stal, jullie stalen, ik heb gestolen
DE fiets, DE boom, DE pad, HET pad, HET paard, DE koe, HET boek
Een klein hondJE, fietsJE, boomPJE, kettingKJE, koeTJE, voetJE, duinTJE
Etc etc. We have a weird language X) Compared to most languages I know, English is the easiest if you ask me.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-28 07:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-15 08:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-15 09:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 04:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 05:40 am (UTC)That's for peekin' in though!